Iowa Ends in Statistical Tie
Clinton Campaign Caught Cheating
February 1, 2016, Iowa. The Iowa Caucuses end in a tie, technically a huge win for Bernie Sanders, seen as the underdog, a people's candidate who didn't have a chance. Bernie is the first candidate to win the Iowa Caucuses without the backing of big money donors. Instead he set a record of collecting over 3,000,000 (three million) individual donations from the people.
Opposing him was Hillary Clinton, a candidate backed by all the money Wall Street could throw at her. While Wall Street typically expects seats at the Chief Executive Table for such donations, by refusing corporate donations and superpacs, Bernie was at a significant disadvantage in a State where most people did not even know his name until the last couple months. He went from single digits to a dead heat in tonight's victory in a state where Hillary Clinton's was known to even the least educated voter. This tie vote will results in the delegates being divided pretty evenly between Sanders and Clinton in Iowa. then it is off to New Hampshire, where Sanders is ahead by 27 points in the polls.
While this victory has propelled Sanders into a position where he could likely get the nomination, it is bad news for Clinton, who had the news media behind her, Wall Street behind her, foreign investors in the Presidency behind her, private prison and military contractor money behind her and the entire fracking and genetically modified food industry behind her. Sadly for those who believed in her, her campaign was caught cheating and trying to rig the election.
One of Clinton's paid out of state staffers was caught posing as a local Iowa precinct captain, something that might result in criminal charges. A video from Polk County reveals that Clinton's precinct captain there counted, as Clinton voters, people who were not even in the room. The Sanders supporters objected to including voters not in the room in the final count but the inclusion of the absent Clinton supporters was allowed to stand anyway. In Cedar County, where people say they voted for Sanders, no votes at all were counted for Sanders. This is reminiscent of the 2008 New Hampshire election, where Ron Paul voters in one county said they showed up in sizable numbers --only to have not a single one of their votes counted at all.
Making matters tougher, one of Hillary's backers supplied the vote-counting software for the State of Iowa, even though such software has been proven to be riggable. It is generally considered fairly easy to alter a vote count with such software by up to ten percent, meaning that anything less than a victory by ten percent for Clinton would be a suspect count. The differences in the results in Iowa were within one or two tenths of one percent. In other words, Sanders could have won by almost ten percent. One of the writers for the Justice Gazette was present for a Demonstration at a Democratic Party meeting ease with which such software could be rigged to fraudulently steal an election. In the demonstration, Osama bin Ladin won the Governorship of California---although all but one person in the hall voted against him. Sanders's supporters had requested that Jimmy Carter and a team of independent election monitors come to Iowa to ensure the accuracy of the caucus results. Had such a team been present, there would not be so many doubts about whether Clinton would have done much more poorly if there had been more honesty on the part of her campaign.
Adding to the doubts about the result were coin tosses to determine the winner of close votes, making chance and not bodies the determining factor. Some feel that one person, one coin does not qualify under the USSC case of Baker v Carr. If Clinton appoints future justices, one man -- one vote, already being called into question, could be one of the next Constitutional principles to go.
While the tie represents a huge victory for Sanders in a State where it was felt he didn't stand a chance, it represents a major loss for Clinton. Voter fraud, coin tossing, and miscounting voters could not give her better than a statistical tie in one of her supposedly safe states.
Martin O'Malley has suspended his campaign and his supporters in other states are expected to go with Sanders. Clinton is counting on Superdelegates, Wall Street and the media industrial complex to save her candidacy. A loss in New Hampshire would put her on a serious downhill slide.
[The above video of Sanders's victory speech was uploaded to Youtube by YouFirstNews. A printed version is also available online uploaded by Jeff Stein is available at Vox Policy and Politics.]
Opposing him was Hillary Clinton, a candidate backed by all the money Wall Street could throw at her. While Wall Street typically expects seats at the Chief Executive Table for such donations, by refusing corporate donations and superpacs, Bernie was at a significant disadvantage in a State where most people did not even know his name until the last couple months. He went from single digits to a dead heat in tonight's victory in a state where Hillary Clinton's was known to even the least educated voter. This tie vote will results in the delegates being divided pretty evenly between Sanders and Clinton in Iowa. then it is off to New Hampshire, where Sanders is ahead by 27 points in the polls.
While this victory has propelled Sanders into a position where he could likely get the nomination, it is bad news for Clinton, who had the news media behind her, Wall Street behind her, foreign investors in the Presidency behind her, private prison and military contractor money behind her and the entire fracking and genetically modified food industry behind her. Sadly for those who believed in her, her campaign was caught cheating and trying to rig the election.
One of Clinton's paid out of state staffers was caught posing as a local Iowa precinct captain, something that might result in criminal charges. A video from Polk County reveals that Clinton's precinct captain there counted, as Clinton voters, people who were not even in the room. The Sanders supporters objected to including voters not in the room in the final count but the inclusion of the absent Clinton supporters was allowed to stand anyway. In Cedar County, where people say they voted for Sanders, no votes at all were counted for Sanders. This is reminiscent of the 2008 New Hampshire election, where Ron Paul voters in one county said they showed up in sizable numbers --only to have not a single one of their votes counted at all.
Making matters tougher, one of Hillary's backers supplied the vote-counting software for the State of Iowa, even though such software has been proven to be riggable. It is generally considered fairly easy to alter a vote count with such software by up to ten percent, meaning that anything less than a victory by ten percent for Clinton would be a suspect count. The differences in the results in Iowa were within one or two tenths of one percent. In other words, Sanders could have won by almost ten percent. One of the writers for the Justice Gazette was present for a Demonstration at a Democratic Party meeting ease with which such software could be rigged to fraudulently steal an election. In the demonstration, Osama bin Ladin won the Governorship of California---although all but one person in the hall voted against him. Sanders's supporters had requested that Jimmy Carter and a team of independent election monitors come to Iowa to ensure the accuracy of the caucus results. Had such a team been present, there would not be so many doubts about whether Clinton would have done much more poorly if there had been more honesty on the part of her campaign.
Adding to the doubts about the result were coin tosses to determine the winner of close votes, making chance and not bodies the determining factor. Some feel that one person, one coin does not qualify under the USSC case of Baker v Carr. If Clinton appoints future justices, one man -- one vote, already being called into question, could be one of the next Constitutional principles to go.
While the tie represents a huge victory for Sanders in a State where it was felt he didn't stand a chance, it represents a major loss for Clinton. Voter fraud, coin tossing, and miscounting voters could not give her better than a statistical tie in one of her supposedly safe states.
Martin O'Malley has suspended his campaign and his supporters in other states are expected to go with Sanders. Clinton is counting on Superdelegates, Wall Street and the media industrial complex to save her candidacy. A loss in New Hampshire would put her on a serious downhill slide.
[The above video of Sanders's victory speech was uploaded to Youtube by YouFirstNews. A printed version is also available online uploaded by Jeff Stein is available at Vox Policy and Politics.]
