Tulsi Scores Knock Out Victory in First Debate
June 26, 2019 Miami, Florida.
Post-debate polls show Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard as the clear runaway winner of the first Presidential debate for the 2020 election. This was in spite of very obvious debate rigging by MSNBC. Rigging and cutting down her time to way less than less popular couldn't stop the only peace candidate made the debate stage.
What do you do when a debate host attack you and the hosts refuse to allow you to answer most questions? You score your points on the few moments you have.
Election rigging started with rigged polls wherein Tulsi’s name was never mentioned and then pollsters claimed to come up with scores for a candidate they did not even ask about. Anyone with an IQ above zero or a memory of 2016 knows that the polls used by the DNC to determine popularity are rigged polls. That's how they cheated Bernie and elected Donald Trump. They faked the polls and rigged the primaries but they didn't sufficiently rig the 2016 election to defeat Trump. None of the polls used by the DNC in determining who will be in the debates have been fair and accurate and the purpose is to try to exclude the most populist candidates by pretending they don't exist.
Fortunately, Tulsi Gabbard was so popular they could not deny her entry.
The first debate showed continued 2020 election rigging as Tulsi was ignored and passed by for most domestic policy questions. The fact that she had legislation in Congress on the subjects she was ignored on and the fact that, unlike the other candidates, her legislation was successful in getting into final must-pass bills s was insufficient to get her included in questions on those subjects. The hosts wanted to make sure that the audience didn’t catch wind of the fact that Tulsi is an expert on domestic policy or that whose positions are aligned with those that made Bernie Sanders and Dennis Kucinich popular. Candidates like Elizabeth Warren who really had no such legislation and had actually opposed progressive positions spouted out generalized platitudes during their disproportionately larger amount of time. In fact most candidates took to platitudes over substance. But not Tulsi. Tulsi spoke specifically with facts.
The debate hosts could not keep Tulsi down. Chuck Todd tried to attack Tulsi with a question that traced back to her childhood. He followed up by allowing Cory Booker to further attack her without any chance for a rebuttal.
Tulsi had significantly less 50% or more less debate time than several of the candidates and well under amount given to seven of the candidates, though her popularity was higher than most according to more accurate surveys.
One would think that with debate fixing against her like that, Tulsi didn’t have a chance. Yet, debate audiences attended by writers for the Justice Gazette and debate viewers who responded to polls declared Tulsi the landslide winner. How is that possible?
Tulsi was the ONLY anti-war candidate on stage. She had to argue against permanent war on the Middle East, Central and South America. She did an effective and informed presentation for peace and won, big time to the applause of the crowd.
See excerpts from the debate that were uploaded by Tulsi's campaign followed by her educating Tim Ryan on war and peace, a video uploaded by someone called The Modern Mind.
Post-debate polls show Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard as the clear runaway winner of the first Presidential debate for the 2020 election. This was in spite of very obvious debate rigging by MSNBC. Rigging and cutting down her time to way less than less popular couldn't stop the only peace candidate made the debate stage.
What do you do when a debate host attack you and the hosts refuse to allow you to answer most questions? You score your points on the few moments you have.
Election rigging started with rigged polls wherein Tulsi’s name was never mentioned and then pollsters claimed to come up with scores for a candidate they did not even ask about. Anyone with an IQ above zero or a memory of 2016 knows that the polls used by the DNC to determine popularity are rigged polls. That's how they cheated Bernie and elected Donald Trump. They faked the polls and rigged the primaries but they didn't sufficiently rig the 2016 election to defeat Trump. None of the polls used by the DNC in determining who will be in the debates have been fair and accurate and the purpose is to try to exclude the most populist candidates by pretending they don't exist.
Fortunately, Tulsi Gabbard was so popular they could not deny her entry.
The first debate showed continued 2020 election rigging as Tulsi was ignored and passed by for most domestic policy questions. The fact that she had legislation in Congress on the subjects she was ignored on and the fact that, unlike the other candidates, her legislation was successful in getting into final must-pass bills s was insufficient to get her included in questions on those subjects. The hosts wanted to make sure that the audience didn’t catch wind of the fact that Tulsi is an expert on domestic policy or that whose positions are aligned with those that made Bernie Sanders and Dennis Kucinich popular. Candidates like Elizabeth Warren who really had no such legislation and had actually opposed progressive positions spouted out generalized platitudes during their disproportionately larger amount of time. In fact most candidates took to platitudes over substance. But not Tulsi. Tulsi spoke specifically with facts.
The debate hosts could not keep Tulsi down. Chuck Todd tried to attack Tulsi with a question that traced back to her childhood. He followed up by allowing Cory Booker to further attack her without any chance for a rebuttal.
Tulsi had significantly less 50% or more less debate time than several of the candidates and well under amount given to seven of the candidates, though her popularity was higher than most according to more accurate surveys.
One would think that with debate fixing against her like that, Tulsi didn’t have a chance. Yet, debate audiences attended by writers for the Justice Gazette and debate viewers who responded to polls declared Tulsi the landslide winner. How is that possible?
Tulsi was the ONLY anti-war candidate on stage. She had to argue against permanent war on the Middle East, Central and South America. She did an effective and informed presentation for peace and won, big time to the applause of the crowd.
See excerpts from the debate that were uploaded by Tulsi's campaign followed by her educating Tim Ryan on war and peace, a video uploaded by someone called The Modern Mind.
|
|
|
