California Democrats Obliterate Patients' Rights, Vote to Eliminate Informed Consent
May 17, 2015. Anaheim, CA. Amidst a weekend of protests from concerned parents demanding Democrats revert to their claimed values of freedom and human rights, the California Democratic Central Committee took a long fall from human rights, voting for a resolution eliminating a patient's right of informed consent to a medical procedure.
Under the pretense of protecting children from a non-existent health crisis, the California Democratic Party voted to mandate an unspecified number of vaccines and to eliminate the right of personal exemptions, which in the case of vaccines is synonymous with informed consent. The resolution was part of a top-down orchestrated strategy to get party insiders to provide the appearance of popular support for California State Senator Richard Pan's SB 277, eliminating personal and religious exemptions for vaccines for school children. The resolution, which was not age-related, did not name the mandated vaccines but referenced a legally-required list that could change with the whim of the legislature. With over 270 new vaccines approaching approval, this resolution could easily promote a mandate of over 300 vaccines that all students (of all ages) in the jurisdiction of California or California students in other jurisdictions would be forced to be injected with --- no information nor consent necessary. Since Big Pharma has been completely exempted from liability for deaths or injuries their vaccines cause, there is no incentive for them to make a safe vaccine.
If SB 277 matched the resolution in its incusion of all students, then adult students taking even a single class anywhere in the State of California (or Californian's taking an out-of-state class) would have to roll up their sleeves and submit to an extensive number of vaccines with no option to refuse. Some professions require continuing education. Attorneys are required to take 24 hours of continuing educaition every three years. The fact that Pan showed up to speak for this resolution may be an indication of where his future legislation will lead. Lawsuits over the current version of SB 277 are already in the planning stages. So perhaps the approximately 183,000 active members of the legal profession who don't want to become human pin cushions have already seen the handwriting on Dr. Pan's wall.
Parents of hundreds of vaccine injured or killed children showed up to the convention May 15th and 16th, only to be greeted by insults and verbal attacks from delegates who treated concerned Democratic parents as the enemy. In reaction to these parents, the party put up a showing of being cold, callous and uncaring about harm caused by its removal of informed consent. Tens of millions of dollars have been poured into this legislation and Democrats have a lot of money riding on pushing through this removal of informed consent. To those pushing the resolution and legislation, sick or dead kids appeared to be an inconvenience to be denied out of existence. Democrats flatly refused to look at evidence of the serious harm caused by the vaccines. Many spouted mantras about studies that had already been declared false by Dr. William Thompson, the lead scientist who was part of the team that reportedly was forced to falsify those very studies.
Under the pretense of protecting children from a non-existent health crisis, the California Democratic Party voted to mandate an unspecified number of vaccines and to eliminate the right of personal exemptions, which in the case of vaccines is synonymous with informed consent. The resolution was part of a top-down orchestrated strategy to get party insiders to provide the appearance of popular support for California State Senator Richard Pan's SB 277, eliminating personal and religious exemptions for vaccines for school children. The resolution, which was not age-related, did not name the mandated vaccines but referenced a legally-required list that could change with the whim of the legislature. With over 270 new vaccines approaching approval, this resolution could easily promote a mandate of over 300 vaccines that all students (of all ages) in the jurisdiction of California or California students in other jurisdictions would be forced to be injected with --- no information nor consent necessary. Since Big Pharma has been completely exempted from liability for deaths or injuries their vaccines cause, there is no incentive for them to make a safe vaccine.
If SB 277 matched the resolution in its incusion of all students, then adult students taking even a single class anywhere in the State of California (or Californian's taking an out-of-state class) would have to roll up their sleeves and submit to an extensive number of vaccines with no option to refuse. Some professions require continuing education. Attorneys are required to take 24 hours of continuing educaition every three years. The fact that Pan showed up to speak for this resolution may be an indication of where his future legislation will lead. Lawsuits over the current version of SB 277 are already in the planning stages. So perhaps the approximately 183,000 active members of the legal profession who don't want to become human pin cushions have already seen the handwriting on Dr. Pan's wall.
Parents of hundreds of vaccine injured or killed children showed up to the convention May 15th and 16th, only to be greeted by insults and verbal attacks from delegates who treated concerned Democratic parents as the enemy. In reaction to these parents, the party put up a showing of being cold, callous and uncaring about harm caused by its removal of informed consent. Tens of millions of dollars have been poured into this legislation and Democrats have a lot of money riding on pushing through this removal of informed consent. To those pushing the resolution and legislation, sick or dead kids appeared to be an inconvenience to be denied out of existence. Democrats flatly refused to look at evidence of the serious harm caused by the vaccines. Many spouted mantras about studies that had already been declared false by Dr. William Thompson, the lead scientist who was part of the team that reportedly was forced to falsify those very studies.
John Hanna
John Hanna, the resolutions chairman and a Wall Street proponent, ran the resolutions portion of the convention meeting. Eleven resolutions had been prioritized for the Convention calendar. Resolution 15-05.15, “Resolution in Support of Repealing California's Personal Beliefs Exemption to Mandatory Vaccinations," which seeks to eliminate the right of informed consent with respect to this medical procedure, was pulled from the approval calendar for the purpose of opposing it by delegates Ruth Hull and Noelle Foster. Noelle Foster had immune-compromised children whose very lives were in danger if they were forced to receive the vaccine. So for Noelle, the resolution took away not only her children's right to refuse medical treatment but also their very right to live since schooling is mandated and the resolution had no exception for homeschooling. The resolution was seconded by Democratic delegate/Registered Nurse Donna Macris, a longtime advocate for a patient's right of informed consent.
Senator Pan
California Democratic Party Controller Hillary Crosby and SB 277 author State Senator Richard Pan spoke for the resolution. Delegates cannot recall any past resolution ever failing when a Democratic elected official spoke for that resolution. In most past instances, only a few delegates have dared stand up against resolutions personally promoted by legislators. The Pharmaceutical lobbyists had a booth in the convention hall. There was a lot of money on the line. According to Robert Kennedy, the Pharmaceutical lobby spends more money promoting their bills than any other lobby, including oil and gas and defense. According to Kennedy, this bill is very important to the Pharmaceutical Lobby and the legislators they sponsor as passage of SB 277 will dramatically increase the net assets of Pharmaceutical corporations. So passage of the resolution by a unanimous or near-unanimous majority was viewed as a certainty.
RFK speaking against SB277
In opposing the resolution,
Ruth Hull stated that she stood with Robert F. Kennedy, Dr. William Thompson
and millions of voting Democratic activists for patients’ rights who were now
fighting to retain the right of informed consent. After speaking of the
importance of the right of informed consent with respect to medical procedures,
she noted that Hepatitis B, which is on the SB 277 mandated list, is a condition
resulting from sex. Note, this Gazette has covered cases of courts
knowingly turning over young children to pedophiles. Forcing babies and young children to receive a
sex vaccine fits with the failure of California leaders to take action to
protect the state’s children from sexual abuse.
R.N. Donna Macris, spoke to the Democratic value of freedom and how removing the right to informed consent was counter to the fundamental principles of the Democratic Party. She spoke of the vaccine injured children and told of the medical realities of the harm that vaccines cause to children. What the speakers did was to give a voice to the concerns of parents and opponents that was otherwise lacking in Democratic insider circles.
The opposition was much stronger than expected. Instead of just a few daring to vote against Senator Pan, roughly 30 to 40% of the delegates joined with the opponents in voting "Nay" to the resolution. Though this was an unprecedented and significant showing against a resolution pushed by an elected official on the floor of the convention, the result was still tragic for Democratic delegate Noelle Foster, who like many other parents has to worry about whether the state is mandating a procedure that could take away the life of her children. A couple of delegates remarked, "How can the party be so heartless." Several Democrats spoke of plans to leave the party as a direct result of what they considered a callous disregard for children’s lives with respect to SB 277 and this resolution.
There have been predictions that SB 277 could end the reign of Democrats in California. Grass roots Democrats are largely disgusted with their Party's failure to stand for human values over money from lobbyists. A low turnout of Democrats in 2016, coupled with a high turnout of angry voters backing a referendum to repeal SB 277, should it become law, could result in a Republican take-over of California, according to several political analysts. SB 277 is not yet law. In the end, Jerry Brown could save his party by vetoing the bill or adding a provision for informed consent in the form of a personal and religious exemption back into the law.
R.N. Donna Macris, spoke to the Democratic value of freedom and how removing the right to informed consent was counter to the fundamental principles of the Democratic Party. She spoke of the vaccine injured children and told of the medical realities of the harm that vaccines cause to children. What the speakers did was to give a voice to the concerns of parents and opponents that was otherwise lacking in Democratic insider circles.
The opposition was much stronger than expected. Instead of just a few daring to vote against Senator Pan, roughly 30 to 40% of the delegates joined with the opponents in voting "Nay" to the resolution. Though this was an unprecedented and significant showing against a resolution pushed by an elected official on the floor of the convention, the result was still tragic for Democratic delegate Noelle Foster, who like many other parents has to worry about whether the state is mandating a procedure that could take away the life of her children. A couple of delegates remarked, "How can the party be so heartless." Several Democrats spoke of plans to leave the party as a direct result of what they considered a callous disregard for children’s lives with respect to SB 277 and this resolution.
There have been predictions that SB 277 could end the reign of Democrats in California. Grass roots Democrats are largely disgusted with their Party's failure to stand for human values over money from lobbyists. A low turnout of Democrats in 2016, coupled with a high turnout of angry voters backing a referendum to repeal SB 277, should it become law, could result in a Republican take-over of California, according to several political analysts. SB 277 is not yet law. In the end, Jerry Brown could save his party by vetoing the bill or adding a provision for informed consent in the form of a personal and religious exemption back into the law.
Some of the victims of vaccines